Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Bioanalysis ; 13(23): 1731-1741, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1518698

ABSTRACT

In response to the outbreak of COVID-19, in accordance with the principles of 'unified command, early involvement, prompt review and scientific approval' as well as the requirements of ensuring product safety, effectiveness and controllable quality, the Center for Medical Device Evaluation (CMDE) has issued Key Points of Technical Review for the Registration of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Tests (Key Points) to provide the requirements of tests. Because of the sustainability of the pandemic, more efforts and attempts are needed for SARS-CoV-2 detection and control. This article interprets the Key Points issued by the CMDE and provides certain refinements to wider audiences.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , China , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Bioanalysis ; 13(2): 77-88, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1022113

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has spread globally since its first report and become a worldwide pandemic. In response to the outbreak of COVID-19, Center for Medical Device Evaluation, NMPA (CMDE) initiated emergency review and approval procedures to accelerate the process of reviewing emergent medical products and issued the Key Points of Technical Review for the Registration of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen/Antibody Tests (Key Points) to provide the requirements on the technical review of the tests. With uncontrolled spread and evolution of COVID-19 in the world, continuous prevention and measurements are necessary for fighting this pandemic and SARS-CoV-2 antigen/antibody tests are still urgently needed. This article is an attempt to expand clarification of the Key Points to wider audiences based on current understanding of SARS-CoV-2 to facilitate the development and application of SARS-CoV-2 antigen/antibody tests.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Antigens, Viral/analysis , COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , Antigen-Antibody Reactions , COVID-19 Testing/instrumentation , China , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cross Reactions , Humans , Immunoglobulin M/analysis , Limit of Detection , Pandemics , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Bioanalysis ; 13(2): 69-76, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-979190

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing an important supplement to nucleic acid testing. In the process of emergency approval, the Center for Medical Device Evaluation of the China National Medical Products Administration released The Key Points of Technical Review for the Registration of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen/Antibody Detection Reagents. The Clinical Study Requirement section of the Key Point has put forward requirements in terms of reference methods and subject enrolment among others, which can ensure that the test results can meet the clinical needs. This article draws on the experience of the China NMPA in evaluating diagnostic reagents used to supplement the gold standard test method in the early stage of an epidemic of an infectious disease, as well as to serve as reference for clinicians and regulators.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/analysis , COVID-19 Testing/methods , Indicators and Reagents/standards , Antigen-Antibody Reactions , COVID-19 , China , Device Approval , Government Agencies , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Pandemics , Patient Selection , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Research Design
4.
J Med Virol ; 92(11): 2777-2784, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-599694

ABSTRACT

The detection data of IgM and IgG antibodies in 169 patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) were analyzed to evaluate differences in clinical performance between the colloidal gold method and chemiluminescence method. In this study, chemiluminescence detection of IgM antibody showed a positive conversion earlier (about 1-2 days earlier), positive conversion rates higher in different stages of disease, and a trend of declining positive rate later than colloidal gold method. For IgG antibody, the chemiluminescence method showed a positive conversion earlier and the positive rate climbing more quickly than the colloidal gold method. No obvious negative-converting tendency of IgG detection was observed within 35 days after the onset of disease. Although colloidal gold method is generally less sensitive than chemiluminescence method, it shows advantages of shorter turn-around time, more simple procedure, and no special equipment required. The two methodologies can be chosen according to different laboratory conditions. A reasonable understanding of the performance of reagents with different methodologies can help in clinical disease diagnosis effectively and assist in the diagnosis of the progression of COVID-19, for which the dynamic changes of antibody will provide reliable evidence.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/analysis , COVID-19/diagnosis , Immunoassay/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/immunology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Gold Colloid , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/analysis , Immunoglobulin M/analysis , Luminescence , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL